‹ All defenses

RBs vs Detroit Lions
As of Week 16 · through 2 games · PPR
Showing every RB who had a role in each game.
Pts / game allowed
22.9
to all RBs
Rank
11
of 32 (1 = most allowed)
vs League
+9%
lg avg 21.0
| Wk | Team | Player | Slot | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NO | Travis Etienne | RB1 | 9 | 46 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 32 | 0 | 14.8 |
| Kendre Miller | RB2 | 9 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.0 | ||
| CJ Donaldson | RB3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 1.2 | ||
| 2 | BUF | James Cook | RB1 | 21 | 135 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.9 |
| Average | 10.3 | 53.8 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 11.5 | |||
| Median | 9.0 | 38.0 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 11.9 | |||
| High | 21 | 135 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 32 | 0 | 20.9 | |||
| Low | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 | 1.2 | |||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- all RBs have averaged 10.3 carries, 53.8 rushing yards and 2.3 receptions per player-game against the Lions across 2 games.
- The Lions allow 22.9 PPR points to the position per game, +9% versus the league average of 21.0 (ranked 11 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a near-average matchup.
- Outlier: Week 2, James Cook (20.9 pts, 21 car, 135 rush yds) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 11.5 vs 8.3; car 10.3 vs 6.7; rush yds 53.8 vs 26.7. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- Outlier: Week 1, CJ Donaldson (1.2 pts, 2 car, 4 rush yds) sits far below the other games and drags the averages down. Average with it vs without it: pts 11.5 vs 14.9; car 10.3 vs 13.0; rush yds 53.8 vs 70.3. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- 2 of 4 player-games reached 10+ PPR points. Scores range from 1.2 to 20.9 (median 11.9).
- all RBs scored a touchdown in 2 of 4 player-games (50%).
- Small sample: only 2 games so far. Treat these numbers as directional, not settled.
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.

