WRs vs Green Bay Packers
As of Week 3 · through 2 games · PPR
WR2 = the second-highest-scoring WR against Packers in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  MIN | Jordan Addison | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 2 |  NYJ | Adonai Mitchell | 12 | 6 | 63 | 0 | 12.3 |
| Average | 7.0 | 3.0 | 31.5 | 0.0 | 6.2 | ||
| Median | 7.0 | 3.0 | 31.5 | 0.0 | 6.2 | ||
| High | 12 | 6 | 63 | 0 | 12.3 | ||
| Low | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Drake London should do vs the PackersSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Packers, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Drake London has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Packers opponents to line them up with: the best WR they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Drake London will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Packers avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Drake London's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Drake London usually produces.
Projected is Drake London's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Packers were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PIT | 4 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 5.5 |
| 2 | CAR | 5 | 4 | 51 | 0 | 8.9 |
| London avg | 4.5 | 3.0 | 40.0 | 0.0 | 7.2 | |
| Packers WR2 avg | 7.0 | 3.0 | 31.5 | 0.0 | 6.2 | |
| Difference | +2.5 | +0.0 | -8.5 | +0.0 | -1.0 | |
| Projected as WR2 | 4.0 | 2.7 | 35.9 | 0.0 | 10.9 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what London averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
Start / Sit · Drake LondonMedium confidence · 13.7 proj ptsStart
Drake London usually plays as the team's WR1, so the verdict uses the WR1 numbers, not the slot selected above.
- Drake London averages 7.2 PPR points over 2 games (recent-weighted 7.4) and has played as the team's WR1.
- The Packers have allowed 23.9 points to WR1s over 2 games (+41% vs league). The model applies 40% of that gap because the sample is small, giving a +17% adjustment.
- Last season's average (16.8) is blended in at 50% weight because this season's sample is small.
- Game environment -5%: Vegas total 44.5, implied 19.0 points for ATL (league avg 22.5); Underdog by 6.5: likely to pass more while trailing; Mild weather (57F, 5 mph wind): no weather adjustment.
- Opposing-defense injuries (+2%): Opposing starter Brandon Cisse (CB) is questionable, which helps the passing game. Opposing starter Edgerrin Cooper (LB) is questionable, which helps the passing game.
- Projection: 13.7 points.
- For reference, a typical weekly starter-level WR scores about 11.8 and a top-tier one about 20.8.
- A statistical model from box scores, Vegas lines, weather and injury tags. It cannot see role changes or in-game events.
Prediction & chance to scoreDrake London vs the Packers
Prediction for Drake London
Nobody knows which slot Drake London will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Packers.
I predict about 14.1 points for Drake London if playing as a WR1. Drake London has averaged 7.2 over 2 games, and the Packers have given up 23.9 to WR1s (+41% vs the league average of 17.0).
How this projection is built
1. The player. Drake London scored: Wk 1 5.5, Wk 2 8.9. Average 7.2; weighted toward recent games it is 12.1.
2. The defense. Over 2 games, the Packers allowed 23.9 points to their opponent's WR1. The league average for that slot is 17.0, so that is +41%.
3. Trusting small samples less. With 2 defensive games, only 40% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a +17% adjustment (x1.17).
4. Result. 12.1 x 1.17 = 14.1. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.
It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.
Chance to score
Type a point total to see how likely Drake London is to reach it as a WR1.
Why this percentage?
The projection (14.1) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 8.5 points, leaning on Drake London's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical WR swings before that).
Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 14.
With only 2 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- WR2s have averaged 3.0 receptions, 31.5 receiving yards and 0.0 receiving TDs against the Packers across 2 games.
- The Packers allow 6.2 PPR points to WR2s, -26% versus the league average of 8.3 (ranked 23 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a tough matchup.
- 1 of 2 games reached 10+ PPR points. Scores range from 0.0 to 12.3 (median 6.2).
- WR2s scored a touchdown in 0 of 2 games (0%).
- Small sample: only 2 games so far. Treat these numbers as directional, not settled.
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.