Johnny Mundt
TE
Philadelphia Eagles
- Quarterback Tanner McKee is questionable. Watch the status.
- Teammate DeVonta Smith (a top target) is questionable.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how TEs have played against the Commanders in the 2026 season.
TE1 = the highest-scoring TE against Commanders in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PHI | Dallas Goedert | 5 | 4 | 77 | 2 | 23.7 |
| 2 |  DAL | Jake Ferguson | 4 | 4 | 43 | 2 | 20.3 |
| 3 |  SEA | AJ Barner | 9 | 5 | 69 | 0 | 11.9 |
| 4 |  IND | Tyler Warren | 5 | 5 | 41 | 0 | 9.1 |
| 5 |  NYG | Isaiah Likely | 13 | 11 | 94 | 2 | 32.4 |
| 6 |  SF | George Kittle | 8 | 5 | 69 | 1 | 17.9 |
| Average | 7.3 | 5.7 | 65.5 | 1.2 | 19.2 | ||
| Median | 6.5 | 5.0 | 69.0 | 1.5 | 19.1 | ||
| High | 13 | 11 | 94 | 2 | 32.4 | ||
| Low | 4 | 4 | 41 | 0 | 9.1 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Johnny Mundt should do vs the CommandersSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Commanders, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Johnny Mundt has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Commanders opponents to line them up with: the best TE they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Johnny Mundt will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Commanders avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Johnny Mundt's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Johnny Mundt usually produces.
Projected is Johnny Mundt's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Commanders were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | TEN | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 2.8 |
| 3 | CHI | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1.4 |
| 5 | JAX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 6 | CAR | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1.4 |
| Mundt avg | 1.5 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 1.4 | |
| Commanders TE1 avg | 7.3 | 5.7 | 65.5 | 1.2 | 19.2 | |
| Difference | +5.8 | +4.7 | +61.5 | +1.2 | +17.8 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Mundt averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
Prediction & chance to scoreJohnny Mundt vs the Commanders
Prediction for Johnny Mundt
Nobody knows which slot Johnny Mundt will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Commanders.
I predict about 1.9 points for Johnny Mundt if playing as a TE1. Johnny Mundt has averaged 1.4 over 4 games, and the Commanders have given up 19.2 to TE1s (+83% vs the league average of 10.5).
How this projection is built
1. The player. Johnny Mundt scored: Wk 2 2.8, Wk 3 1.4, Wk 5 0.0, Wk 6 1.4. Average 1.4; weighted toward recent games it is 1.5.
2. The defense. Over 6 games, the Commanders allowed 19.2 points to their opponent's TE1. The league average for that slot is 10.5, so that is +83%.
3. Trusting small samples less. With 6 defensive games, only 67% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a +30% adjustment (x1.30).
4. Result. 1.5 x 1.30 = 1.9. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.
It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.
Chance to score
Type a point total to see how likely Johnny Mundt is to reach it as a TE1.
Why this percentage?
The projection (1.9) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 1.1 points, leaning on Johnny Mundt's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical TE swings before that).
Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 2.
With only 4 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- TE1s have averaged 5.7 receptions, 65.5 receiving yards and 1.2 receiving TDs against the Commanders across 6 games.
- The Commanders allow 19.2 PPR points to TE1s, +83% versus the league average of 10.5 (ranked 1 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- Outlier: Week 5, Isaiah Likely (32.4 pts, 11 rec) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 19.2 vs 16.6; rec 5.7 vs 4.6. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- 6 of 6 games reached 7+ PPR points. Scores range from 9.1 to 32.4 (median 19.1).
- Every TE1 in the sample cleared 40 receiving yards.
- TE1s scored a touchdown in 4 of 6 games (67%).
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.