Kendrick Bourne
WR
Arizona CardinalsIR
- Teammate Michael Wilson (a top target) is questionable.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how WRs have played against the Giants in the 2026 season.
WR2 = the second-highest-scoring WR against Giants in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  DAL | George Pickens | 6 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 5.8 |
| 2 |  LA | Tutu Atwell | 2 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 2.9 |
| 3 |  TEN | Carnell Tate | 9 | 6 | 58 | 0 | 11.8 |
| Average | 5.7 | 3.3 | 35.0 | 0.0 | 6.8 | ||
| Median | 6.0 | 3.0 | 28.0 | 0.0 | 5.8 | ||
| High | 9 | 6 | 58 | 0 | 11.8 | ||
| Low | 2 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 2.9 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Kendrick Bourne should do vs the GiantsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Giants, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Kendrick Bourne has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Giants opponents to line them up with: the best WR they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Kendrick Bourne will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Giants avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Kendrick Bourne's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Kendrick Bourne usually produces.
Projected is Kendrick Bourne's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Giants were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LAC | 8 | 8 | 75 | 0 | 15.5 |
| 2 | SEA | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 3.1 |
| 3 | SF | 3 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 4.2 |
| 5 | DET | 8 | 5 | 70 | 0 | 12.0 |
| 6 | LA | 8 | 5 | 47 | 0 | 9.7 |
| 7 | DEN | 6 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 3.9 |
| 8 | DAL | 2 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 3.9 |
| Bourne avg | 5.4 | 3.7 | 37.6 | 0.0 | 7.5 | |
| Giants WR2 avg | 5.7 | 3.3 | 35.0 | 0.0 | 6.8 | |
| Difference | +0.2 | -0.4 | -2.6 | +0.0 | -0.6 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Bourne averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
Prediction & chance to scoreKendrick Bourne vs the Giants
Prediction for Kendrick Bourne
Nobody knows which slot Kendrick Bourne will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Giants.
I predict about 6.0 points for Kendrick Bourne if playing as a WR2. Kendrick Bourne has averaged 7.6 over 3 games, and the Giants have given up 6.8 to WR2s (-21% vs the league average of 8.7).
How this projection is built
1. The player. Kendrick Bourne scored: Wk 1 15.5, Wk 2 3.1, Wk 3 4.2. Average 7.6; weighted toward recent games it is 6.7.
2. The defense. Over 3 games, the Giants allowed 6.8 points to their opponent's WR2. The league average for that slot is 8.7, so that is -21%.
3. Trusting small samples less. With 3 defensive games, only 50% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a -11% adjustment (x0.89).
4. Result. 6.7 x 0.89 = 6.0. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.
It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.
Chance to score
Type a point total to see how likely Kendrick Bourne is to reach it as a WR2.
Why this percentage?
The projection (6.0) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 5.2 points, leaning on Kendrick Bourne's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical WR swings before that).
Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 6.
With only 3 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- WR2s have averaged 3.3 receptions, 35.0 receiving yards and 0.0 receiving TDs against the Giants across 3 games.
- The Giants allow 6.8 PPR points to WR2s, -21% versus the league average of 8.7 (ranked 24 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a tough matchup.
- Outlier: Week 3, Carnell Tate (11.8 pts, 6 rec) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 6.8 vs 4.3; rec 3.3 vs 2.0. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- Outlier: Week 2, Tutu Atwell (1 rec) sits far below the other games and drags the averages down. Average with it vs without it: rec 3.3 vs 4.5. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- 1 of 3 games reached 10+ PPR points. Scores range from 2.9 to 11.8 (median 5.8).
- WR2s scored a touchdown in 0 of 3 games (0%).
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.