Najee Harris
RB
New York Giants
- Teammate Malik Nabers (a top target) is questionable.
- Backfield mate Cam Skattebo is questionable, so Harris could see more carries.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how RBs have played against the Rams in the 2026 season.
RB2 = the second-highest-scoring RB against Rams in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  SF | Kaelon Black | 14 | 65 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 8.0 |
| Average | 14.0 | 65.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | ||
| Median | 14.0 | 65.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | ||
| High | 14 | 65 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 8.0 | ||
| Low | 14 | 65 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 8.0 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Najee Harris should do vs the RamsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Rams, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Najee Harris has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Rams opponents to line them up with: the best RB they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Najee Harris will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Rams avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Najee Harris's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Najee Harris usually produces.
Projected is Najee Harris's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Rams were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | LA | 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.6 |
| 3 | TEN | 9 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.2 |
| 4 | ARI | 9 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3.0 |
| 5 | WAS | 5 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2.4 |
| 6 | NO | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.2 |
| Harris avg | 6.2 | 19.8 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | |
| Rams RB2 avg | 14.0 | 65.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 8.0 | |
| Difference | +7.8 | +45.2 | +0.0 | +0.8 | +0.8 | +4.0 | +0.0 | +5.7 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Harris averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- RB2s have averaged 14.0 carries, 65.0 rushing yards and 1.0 receptions against the Rams across 1 game.
- The Rams allow 8.0 PPR points to RB2s, +54% versus the league average of 5.2 (ranked 7 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- RB2s scored a touchdown in 0 of 1 games (0%).
- Small sample: only 1 game so far. Treat these numbers as directional, not settled.
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.