Teagan Quitoriano
TE
Arizona Cardinals
- Teammate Michael Wilson (a top target) is questionable.
- Teammate Kendrick Bourne (a top target) is on IR, so Quitoriano may see more targets.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how TEs have played against the Lions in the 2026 season.
TE1 = the highest-scoring TE against Lions in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  NO | Juwan Johnson | 7 | 3 | 54 | 1 | 14.4 |
| 2 |  BUF | Dalton Kincaid | 8 | 7 | 95 | 1 | 22.5 |
| 3 |  NYJ | Kenyon Sadiq | 8 | 7 | 105 | 1 | 23.5 |
| 4 |  CAR | Darren Waller | 6 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 6.6 |
| Average | 7.3 | 5.0 | 72.5 | 0.8 | 16.8 | ||
| Median | 7.5 | 5.0 | 74.5 | 1.0 | 18.4 | ||
| High | 8 | 7 | 105 | 1 | 23.5 | ||
| Low | 6 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 6.6 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Teagan Quitoriano should do vs the LionsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Lions, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Teagan Quitoriano has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Lions opponents to line them up with: the best TE they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Teagan Quitoriano will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Lions avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Teagan Quitoriano's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Teagan Quitoriano usually produces.
Projected is Teagan Quitoriano's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Lions were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | DET | 2 | 2 | 15 | 2 | 15.5 |
| Quitoriano avg | 2.0 | 2.0 | 15.0 | 2.0 | 15.5 | |
| Lions TE1 avg | 7.3 | 5.0 | 72.5 | 0.8 | 16.8 | |
| Difference | +5.3 | +3.0 | +57.5 | -1.3 | +1.3 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Quitoriano averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- TE1s have averaged 5.0 receptions, 72.5 receiving yards and 0.8 receiving TDs against the Lions across 4 games.
- The Lions allow 16.8 PPR points to TE1s, +63% versus the league average of 10.3 (ranked 1 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- Outlier: Week 3, Kenyon Sadiq (23.5 pts, 105 yds) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 16.8 vs 14.5; yds 72.5 vs 61.7. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- Outlier: Week 4, Darren Waller (6.6 pts) sits far below the other games and drags the averages down. Average with it vs without it: pts 16.8 vs 20.1. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- 3 of 4 games reached 7+ PPR points. Scores range from 6.6 to 23.5 (median 18.4).
- Every TE1 in the sample cleared 30 receiving yards.
- TE1s scored a touchdown in 3 of 4 games (75%).
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.