SportsProof
Tucker Kraft

Tucker Kraft

TEGBGreen Bay Packers

Other TEs on GB
Heads up
  • Teammate Christian Watson (a top target) is questionable.
  • Teammate MarShawn Lloyd (a top target) is questionable.

A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.

Games
8
2026 season
PPR PPG
11.1
TE13 overall
Total pts
88.5

This is how TEs have played against the Vikings in the 2026 season.

TE1 = the highest-scoring TE against Vikings in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.

WkTeamPlayerTgtRecReYdReTDFPts
1GBGBTucker Kraft636509.5
2CHICHISam Roush31901.9
3TBTBCade Otton635608.6
4MIAMIAWill Kacmarek211502.5
5NONOJuwan Johnson541605.6
7INDINDAndrew Ogletree221203.2
8DETDETSam LaPorta533306.5
Average4.12.429.40.05.4
Median5.03.016.00.05.6
High646509.5
Low21901.9

Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.

TE1 avg pts
5.4
PPR per game
Rank
32
of 32 (1 = most allowed)
vs League
-49%
lg avg 10.5
How Tucker Kraft should do vs the VikingsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection

Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Vikings, plus a projection for this game.

What is this table?

Rows at the top are every game Tucker Kraft has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.

Compare against picks which group of Vikings opponents to line them up with: the best TE they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Tucker Kraft will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.

Vikings avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Tucker Kraft's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Tucker Kraft usually produces.

Projected is Tucker Kraft's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Vikings were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.

Compare against
WkOppTgtRecReYdReTDFPts
1MIN636509.5
2NYJ321503.5
3ATL842606.6
4TB7642116.5
5CHI5564011.6
6DAL853708.7
7DET6448114.8
8CAR6653117.3
Kraft avg6.14.443.80.411.1
Vikings TE1 avg4.12.429.40.05.4
Difference-2.0-1.9-14.3-0.4-5.7
Projected as TE14.33.130.60.39.1

Difference is what the defense allows minus what Kraft averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.

Start / Sit · Tucker KraftGood confidence · 9.1 proj pts1/10 start
  • Tucker Kraft averages 11.1 PPR points over 8 games (recent-weighted 12.6) and has played as the team's TE1.
  • The Vikings have allowed 5.4 points to TE1s over 7 games (-49% vs league). The model applies 70% of that gap because the sample is small, giving a -30% adjustment.
  • Last season's average (14.6) is blended in at 20% weight because this season's sample is small.
  • Projection: 9.1 points.
  • For reference, a typical weekly starter-level TE scores about 13.5 and a top-tier one about 19.5.
  • A statistical model from box scores, Vegas lines, weather and injury tags. It cannot see role changes or in-game events.
Prediction & chance to scoreTucker Kraft vs the Vikings

Prediction for Tucker Kraft

Nobody knows which slot Tucker Kraft will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Vikings.

If Tucker Kraft plays as
9.1
projected PPR points

I predict about 9.1 points for Tucker Kraft if playing as a TE1. Tucker Kraft has averaged 11.1 over 8 games, and the Vikings have given up 5.4 to TE1s (-49% vs the league average of 10.5).

How this projection is built

1. The player. Tucker Kraft scored: Wk 1 9.5, Wk 2 3.5, Wk 3 6.6, Wk 4 16.5, Wk 5 11.6, Wk 6 8.7, Wk 7 14.8, Wk 8 17.3. Average 11.1; weighted toward recent games it is 13.0.

2. The defense. Over 7 games, the Vikings allowed 5.4 points to their opponent's TE1. The league average for that slot is 10.5, so that is -49%.

3. Trusting small samples less. With 7 defensive games, only 70% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a -30% adjustment (x0.70).

4. Result. 13.0 x 0.70 = 9.1. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.

It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.

Chance to score

Type a point total to see how likely Tucker Kraft is to reach it as a TE1.

44%
chance of 9+ PPR points
Why this percentage?

The projection (9.1) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 4.9 points, leaning on Tucker Kraft's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical TE swings before that).

Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 9.

With only 8 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.

InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
  • TE1s have averaged 2.4 receptions, 29.4 receiving yards and 0.0 receiving TDs against the Vikings across 7 games.
  • The Vikings allow 5.4 PPR points to TE1s, -49% versus the league average of 10.5 (ranked 32 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a tough matchup.
  • Outlier: Week 1, Tucker Kraft (65 yds) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: yds 29.4 vs 23.5. The table above keeps the raw averages.
  • Outlier: Week 3, Cade Otton (56 yds) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: yds 29.4 vs 25.0. The table above keeps the raw averages.
  • 2 of 7 games reached 7+ PPR points. Scores range from 1.9 to 9.5 (median 5.6).
  • TE1s scored a touchdown in 0 of 7 games (0%).

Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.