Zach Charbonnet
RB
Seattle Seahawks
- Quarterback Sam Darnold is out, so a backup is throwing. Charbonnet's numbers may take a hit.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how RBs have played against the Commanders in the 2026 season.
RB1 = the highest-scoring RB against Commanders in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  PHI | Saquon Barkley | 15 | 83 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 9.0 |
| 2 |  DAL | Javonte Williams | 12 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 8.0 |
| Average | 13.5 | 56.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 8.5 | ||
| Median | 13.5 | 56.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 8.5 | ||
| High | 15 | 83 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 9.0 | ||
| Low | 12 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 8.0 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Zach Charbonnet should do vs the CommandersSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Commanders, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Zach Charbonnet has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Commanders opponents to line them up with: the best RB they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Zach Charbonnet will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Commanders avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Zach Charbonnet's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Zach Charbonnet usually produces.
Projected is Zach Charbonnet's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Commanders were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | CHI | 6 | 23 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 5.9 |
| Charbonnet avg | 6.0 | 23.0 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 5.9 | |
| Commanders RB1 avg | 13.5 | 56.5 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 8.5 | 0.0 | 8.5 | |
| Difference | +7.5 | +33.5 | +0.0 | -1.0 | -1.0 | +2.5 | +0.0 | +2.6 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Charbonnet averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- RB1s have averaged 13.5 carries, 56.5 rushing yards and 2.0 receptions against the Commanders across 2 games.
- The Commanders allow 8.5 PPR points to RB1s, -45% versus the league average of 15.6 (ranked 30 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a tough matchup.
- 0 of 2 games reached 10+ PPR points. Scores range from 8.0 to 9.0 (median 8.5).
- Every RB1 in the sample cleared 30 rushing yards.
- RB1s scored a touchdown in 0 of 2 games (0%).
- Small sample: only 2 games so far. Treat these numbers as directional, not settled.
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.