Jake Briningstool
TE
Kansas City Chiefs
This is how TEs have played against the Raiders in the 2026 season.
TE1 = the highest-scoring TE against Raiders in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  MIA | Greg Dulcich | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 3.8 |
| 2 |  LAC | Oronde Gadsden II | 2 | 2 | 18 | 1 | 9.8 |
| 3 |  NO | Juwan Johnson | 8 | 8 | 53 | 2 | 23.3 |
| Average | 4.0 | 4.0 | 29.7 | 1.0 | 12.3 | ||
| Median | 2.0 | 2.0 | 18.0 | 1.0 | 9.8 | ||
| High | 8 | 8 | 53 | 2 | 23.3 | ||
| Low | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 3.8 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Jake Briningstool should do vs the RaidersSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Raiders, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Jake Briningstool has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Raiders opponents to line them up with: the best TE they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Jake Briningstool will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Raiders avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Jake Briningstool's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Jake Briningstool usually produces.
Projected is Jake Briningstool's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Raiders were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEN | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 1.9 |
| 3 | MIA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 8 | DEN | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1.6 |
| Briningstool avg | 1.0 | 0.7 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 1.2 | |
| Raiders TE1 avg | 4.0 | 4.0 | 29.7 | 1.0 | 12.3 | |
| Difference | +3.0 | +3.3 | +24.7 | +1.0 | +11.1 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Briningstool averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
Prediction & chance to scoreJake Briningstool vs the Raiders
Prediction for Jake Briningstool
Nobody knows which slot Jake Briningstool will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Raiders.
I predict about 0.9 points for Jake Briningstool if playing as a TE1. Jake Briningstool has averaged 0.9 over 2 games, and the Raiders have given up 12.3 to TE1s (+17% vs the league average of 10.5).
How this projection is built
1. The player. Jake Briningstool scored: Wk 1 1.9, Wk 3 0.0. Average 0.9; weighted toward recent games it is 0.8.
2. The defense. Over 3 games, the Raiders allowed 12.3 points to their opponent's TE1. The league average for that slot is 10.5, so that is +17%.
3. Trusting small samples less. With 3 defensive games, only 50% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a +9% adjustment (x1.09).
4. Result. 0.8 x 1.09 = 0.9. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.
It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.
Chance to score
Type a point total to see how likely Jake Briningstool is to reach it as a TE1.
Why this percentage?
The projection (0.9) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 0.5 points, leaning on Jake Briningstool's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical TE swings before that).
Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 1.
With only 2 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- TE1s have averaged 4.0 receptions, 29.7 receiving yards and 1.0 receiving TDs against the Raiders across 3 games.
- The Raiders allow 12.3 PPR points to TE1s, +17% versus the league average of 10.5 (ranked 12 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- Outlier: Week 3, Juwan Johnson (23.3 pts, 8 rec, 53 yds) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 12.3 vs 6.8; rec 4.0 vs 2.0; yds 29.7 vs 18.0. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- Outlier: Week 1, Greg Dulcich (3.8 pts, 2 rec) sits far below the other games and drags the averages down. Average with it vs without it: pts 12.3 vs 16.6; rec 4.0 vs 5.0. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- 2 of 3 games reached 7+ PPR points. Scores range from 3.8 to 23.3 (median 9.8).
- TE1s scored a touchdown in 2 of 3 games (67%).
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.