Thomas Fidone II
TE
New York Giants
- Teammate Malik Nabers (a top target) is questionable.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how TEs have played against the Cardinals in the 2026 season.
TE1 = the highest-scoring TE against Cardinals in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  LAC | David Njoku | 5 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 10.8 |
| 2 |  SEA | AJ Barner | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 7.9 |
| 3 |  SF | George Kittle | 7 | 6 | 82 | 2 | 26.2 |
| Average | 4.3 | 4.0 | 49.3 | 0.7 | 15.0 | ||
| Median | 5.0 | 5.0 | 58.0 | 0.0 | 10.8 | ||
| High | 7 | 6 | 82 | 2 | 26.2 | ||
| Low | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 7.9 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Thomas Fidone II should do vs the CardinalsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Cardinals, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Thomas Fidone II has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Cardinals opponents to line them up with: the best TE they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Thomas Fidone II will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Cardinals avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Thomas Fidone II's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Thomas Fidone II usually produces.
Projected is Thomas Fidone II's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Cardinals were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | HOU | 1 | 1 | 29 | 0 | 3.9 |
| II avg | 1.0 | 1.0 | 29.0 | 0.0 | 3.9 | |
| Cardinals TE1 avg | 4.3 | 4.0 | 49.3 | 0.7 | 15.0 | |
| Difference | +3.3 | +3.0 | +20.3 | +0.7 | +11.1 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what II averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- TE1s have averaged 4.0 receptions, 49.3 receiving yards and 0.7 receiving TDs against the Cardinals across 3 games.
- The Cardinals allow 15.0 PPR points to TE1s, +42% versus the league average of 10.5 (ranked 4 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- Outlier: Week 3, George Kittle (26.2 pts, 6 rec, 82 yds) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 15.0 vs 9.4; rec 4.0 vs 3.0; yds 49.3 vs 33.0. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- Outlier: Week 2, AJ Barner (1 rec, 8 yds) sits far below the other games and drags the averages down. Average with it vs without it: rec 4.0 vs 5.5; yds 49.3 vs 70.0. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- 3 of 3 games reached 7+ PPR points. Scores range from 7.9 to 26.2 (median 10.8).
- TE1s scored a touchdown in 2 of 3 games (67%).
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.