Mark Redman
TE
Green Bay Packers
- Teammate Christian Watson (a top target) is questionable.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how TEs have played against the Falcons in the 2026 season.
TE1 = the highest-scoring TE against Falcons in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  PIT | Pat Freiermuth | 5 | 5 | 46 | 1 | 15.6 |
| 2 |  CAR | Darren Waller | 3 | 3 | 33 | 2 | 18.3 |
| Average | 4.0 | 4.0 | 39.5 | 1.5 | 16.9 | ||
| Median | 4.0 | 4.0 | 39.5 | 1.5 | 16.9 | ||
| High | 5 | 5 | 46 | 2 | 18.3 | ||
| Low | 3 | 3 | 33 | 1 | 15.6 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Mark Redman should do vs the FalconsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Falcons, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Mark Redman has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Falcons opponents to line them up with: the best TE they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Mark Redman will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Falcons avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Mark Redman's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Mark Redman usually produces.
Projected is Mark Redman's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Falcons were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | TB | 2 | 2 | 29 | 0 | 4.9 |
| 7 | DET | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Redman avg | 1.5 | 1.0 | 14.5 | 0.0 | 2.5 | |
| Falcons TE1 avg | 4.0 | 4.0 | 39.5 | 1.5 | 16.9 | |
| Difference | +2.5 | +3.0 | +25.0 | +1.5 | +14.5 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Redman averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- TE1s have averaged 4.0 receptions, 39.5 receiving yards and 1.5 receiving TDs against the Falcons across 2 games.
- The Falcons allow 16.9 PPR points to TE1s, +64% versus the league average of 10.4 (ranked 4 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- 2 of 2 games reached 7+ PPR points. Scores range from 15.6 to 18.3 (median 16.9).
- Every TE1 in the sample cleared 30 receiving yards.
- TE1s scored a touchdown in 2 of 2 games (100%).
- Small sample: only 2 games so far. Treat these numbers as directional, not settled.
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.