Malachi Fields
WR
New York Giants
- Teammate Malik Nabers (a top target) is questionable.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how WRs have played against the Rams in the 2026 season.
WR2 = the second-highest-scoring WR against Rams in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  SF | Mike Evans | 7 | 6 | 49 | 1 | 16.9 |
| Average | 7.0 | 6.0 | 49.0 | 1.0 | 16.9 | ||
| Median | 7.0 | 6.0 | 49.0 | 1.0 | 16.9 | ||
| High | 7 | 6 | 49 | 1 | 16.9 | ||
| Low | 7 | 6 | 49 | 1 | 16.9 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Malachi Fields should do vs the RamsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Rams, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Malachi Fields has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Rams opponents to line them up with: the best WR they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Malachi Fields will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Rams avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Malachi Fields's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Malachi Fields usually produces.
Projected is Malachi Fields's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Rams were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DAL | 4 | 2 | 25 | 0 | 4.5 |
| 2 | LA | 6 | 2 | 30 | 0 | 5.0 |
| 3 | TEN | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 3.9 |
| 4 | ARI | 3 | 2 | 52 | 1 | 13.2 |
| 5 | WAS | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 4.0 |
| 6 | NO | 8 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 3.9 |
| 7 | HOU | 5 | 4 | 83 | 0 | 12.3 |
| Fields avg | 4.3 | 2.3 | 35.4 | 0.1 | 6.7 | |
| Rams WR2 avg | 7.0 | 6.0 | 49.0 | 1.0 | 16.9 | |
| Difference | +2.7 | +3.7 | +13.6 | +0.9 | +10.2 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Fields averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
Prediction & chance to scoreMalachi Fields vs the Rams
Prediction for Malachi Fields
Nobody knows which slot Malachi Fields will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Rams.
I predict about 5.7 points for Malachi Fields if playing as a WR2. Malachi Fields has averaged 4.5 over 1 game, and the Rams have given up 16.9 to WR2s (+106% vs the league average of 8.2).
How this projection is built
1. The player. Malachi Fields scored: Wk 1 4.5. Average 4.5; weighted toward recent games it is 4.5.
2. The defense. Over 1 game, the Rams allowed 16.9 points to their opponent's WR2. The league average for that slot is 8.2, so that is +106%.
3. Trusting small samples less. With 1 defensive game, only 25% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a +27% adjustment (x1.27).
4. Result. 4.5 x 1.27 = 5.7. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.
It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.
Chance to score
Type a point total to see how likely Malachi Fields is to reach it as a WR2.
Why this percentage?
The projection (5.7) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 3.4 points, leaning on Malachi Fields's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical WR swings before that).
Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 6.
With only 1 game of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- WR2s have averaged 6.0 receptions, 49.0 receiving yards and 1.0 receiving TDs against the Rams across 1 game.
- The Rams allow 16.9 PPR points to WR2s, +106% versus the league average of 8.2 (ranked 2 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- WR2s scored a touchdown in 1 of 1 games (100%).
- Small sample: only 1 game so far. Treat these numbers as directional, not settled.
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.