SportsProof
‹ All defenses
PIT

TEs vs Pittsburgh Steelers

As of Week 18 · through 2 games · PPR

Showing every TE who had a role in each game.

Pts / game allowed
5.5
to all TEs
Rank
30
of 32 (1 = most allowed)
vs League
-57%
lg avg 12.9
WkTeamPlayerSlotTgtRecReYdReTDFPts
1ATLATLKyle PittsTE110000.0
2NENEHunter HenryTE1534007.0
Eli RaridonTE2113004.0
Average2.31.323.30.03.7
Median1.01.030.00.04.0
High534007.0
Low10000.0

Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.

InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
  • all TEs have averaged 1.3 receptions, 23.3 receiving yards and 0.0 receiving TDs per player-game against the Steelers across 2 games.
  • The Steelers allow 5.5 PPR points to the position per game, -57% versus the league average of 12.9 (ranked 30 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a tough matchup.
  • Outlier: Week 1, Kyle Pitts (0.0 pts, 0 yds) sits far below the other games and drags the averages down. Average with it vs without it: pts 3.7 vs 5.5; yds 23.3 vs 35.0. The table above keeps the raw averages.
  • Outlier: Week 2, Hunter Henry (7.0 pts) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 3.7 vs 2.0. The table above keeps the raw averages.
  • 1 of 3 player-games reached 7+ PPR points. Scores range from 0.0 to 7.0 (median 4.0).
  • all TEs scored a touchdown in 0 of 3 player-games (0%).
  • Small sample: only 2 games so far. Treat these numbers as directional, not settled.

Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.

What do these columns mean?
Wk
Week of the season
Tgt
Targets (passes thrown to the player)
Rec
Receptions
ReYd
Receiving yards
ReTD
Receiving touchdowns
Car
Carries (rushing attempts)
RuYd
Rushing yards
RuTD
Rushing touchdowns
Cmp / Att
Completions and pass attempts
PaYd / PaTD
Passing yards and touchdowns
INT
Interceptions thrown
FGM / FGA
Field goals made and attempted
FPts
Fantasy points in your scoring format
Sck / TO
Defense: sacks and takeaways
PA
Points allowed by a defense
G
Games in the sample
vs Lg
Percent above or below the league average