WRs vs Las Vegas Raiders
As of Week 14 · through 2 games · PPR
WR1 = the highest-scoring WR against Raiders in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  MIA | Caleb Douglas | 7 | 5 | 94 | 0 | 14.4 |
| 2 |  LAC | Ladd McConkey | 3 | 3 | 35 | 0 | 6.5 |
| Average | 5.0 | 4.0 | 64.5 | 0.0 | 10.4 | ||
| Median | 5.0 | 4.0 | 64.5 | 0.0 | 10.4 | ||
| High | 7 | 5 | 94 | 0 | 14.4 | ||
| Low | 3 | 3 | 35 | 0 | 6.5 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Tre Harris should do vs the RaidersSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Raiders, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Tre Harris has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Raiders opponents to line them up with: the best WR they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Tre Harris will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Raiders avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Tre Harris's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Tre Harris usually produces.
Projected is Tre Harris's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Raiders were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ARI | 6 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 5.0 |
| 2 | LV | 3 | 1 | 53 | 0 | 6.3 |
| Harris avg | 4.5 | 2.0 | 36.5 | 0.0 | 5.7 | |
| Raiders WR3 avg | 3.5 | 1.0 | 16.0 | 0.0 | 3.0 | |
| Difference | -1.0 | -1.0 | -20.5 | +0.0 | -2.7 | |
| Projected as WR3 | 3.9 | 1.7 | 31.3 | 0.0 | 4.3 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Harris averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
Start / Sit · Tre HarrisMedium confidence · 4.5 proj ptsSit
Tre Harris usually plays as the team's WR2, so the verdict uses the WR2 numbers, not the slot selected above.
- Tre Harris averages 5.7 PPR points over 2 games (recent-weighted 5.7) and has played as the team's WR2.
- The Raiders have allowed 6.3 points to WR2s over 2 games (-24% vs league). The model applies 40% of that gap because the sample is small, giving a -10% adjustment.
- Last season's average (4.3) is blended in at 50% weight because this season's sample is small.
- Projection: 4.5 points.
- For reference, a typical weekly starter-level WR scores about 11.8 and a top-tier one about 20.8.
- A statistical model from box scores, Vegas lines, weather and injury tags. It cannot see role changes or in-game events.
Prediction & chance to scoreTre Harris vs the Raiders
Prediction for Tre Harris
Nobody knows which slot Tre Harris will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Raiders.
I predict about 4.5 points for Tre Harris if playing as a WR2. Tre Harris has averaged 5.7 over 2 games, and the Raiders have given up 6.3 to WR2s (-24% vs the league average of 8.3).
How this projection is built
1. The player. Tre Harris scored: Wk 1 5.0, Wk 2 6.3. Average 5.7; weighted toward recent games it is 5.0.
2. The defense. Over 2 games, the Raiders allowed 6.3 points to their opponent's WR2. The league average for that slot is 8.3, so that is -24%.
3. Trusting small samples less. With 2 defensive games, only 40% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a -10% adjustment (x0.90).
4. Result. 5.0 x 0.90 = 4.5. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.
It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.
Chance to score
Type a point total to see how likely Tre Harris is to reach it as a WR2.
Why this percentage?
The projection (4.5) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 2.7 points, leaning on Tre Harris's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical WR swings before that).
Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 5.
With only 2 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- WR1s have averaged 4.0 receptions, 64.5 receiving yards and 0.0 receiving TDs against the Raiders across 2 games.
- The Raiders allow 10.4 PPR points to WR1s, -38% versus the league average of 17.0 (ranked 28 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a tough matchup.
- 1 of 2 games reached 10+ PPR points. Scores range from 6.5 to 14.4 (median 10.4).
- Every WR1 in the sample cleared 30 receiving yards.
- WR1s scored a touchdown in 0 of 2 games (0%).
- Small sample: only 2 games so far. Treat these numbers as directional, not settled.
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.