Colby Parkinson
TE
Los Angeles RamsQ▲ Hot
- Teammate Davante Adams (a top target) is on IR, so Parkinson may see more targets.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how TEs have played against the Cardinals in the 2026 season.
TE1 = the highest-scoring TE against Cardinals in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  LAC | David Njoku | 5 | 5 | 58 | 0 | 10.8 |
| 2 |  SEA | AJ Barner | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 7.9 |
| 3 |  SF | George Kittle | 7 | 6 | 82 | 2 | 26.2 |
| 4 |  NYG | Isaiah Likely | 12 | 7 | 66 | 0 | 13.6 |
| 5 |  DET | Sam LaPorta | 5 | 5 | 88 | 1 | 19.8 |
| Average | 6.0 | 4.8 | 60.4 | 0.6 | 15.7 | ||
| Median | 5.0 | 5.0 | 66.0 | 0.0 | 13.6 | ||
| High | 12 | 7 | 88 | 2 | 26.2 | ||
| Low | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 7.9 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Colby Parkinson should do vs the CardinalsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Cardinals, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Colby Parkinson has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Cardinals opponents to line them up with: the best TE they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Colby Parkinson will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Cardinals avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Colby Parkinson's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Colby Parkinson usually produces.
Projected is Colby Parkinson's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Cardinals were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SF | 2 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1.6 |
| 2 | NYG | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 3.5 |
| 3 | DEN | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | BUF | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1.3 |
| 6 | ARI | 6 | 5 | 31 | 1 | 14.1 |
| 7 | LV | 6 | 5 | 48 | 0 | 9.8 |
| Parkinson avg | 3.2 | 2.3 | 17.2 | 0.2 | 5.0 | |
| Cardinals TE1 avg | 6.0 | 4.8 | 60.4 | 0.6 | 15.7 | |
| Difference | +2.8 | +2.5 | +43.2 | +0.4 | +10.6 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Parkinson averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
Prediction & chance to scoreColby Parkinson vs the Cardinals
Prediction for Colby Parkinson
Nobody knows which slot Colby Parkinson will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Cardinals.
I predict about 5.3 points for Colby Parkinson if playing as a TE1. Colby Parkinson has averaged 1.6 over 4 games, and the Cardinals have given up 15.7 to TE1s (+50% vs the league average of 10.4).
How this projection is built
1. The player. Colby Parkinson scored: Wk 1 1.6, Wk 2 3.5, Wk 3 0.0, Wk 5 1.3. Average 1.6; weighted toward recent games it is 4.1.
2. The defense. Over 5 games, the Cardinals allowed 15.7 points to their opponent's TE1. The league average for that slot is 10.4, so that is +50%.
3. Trusting small samples less. With 5 defensive games, only 63% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a +30% adjustment (x1.30).
4. Result. 4.1 x 1.30 = 5.3. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.
It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.
Chance to score
Type a point total to see how likely Colby Parkinson is to reach it as a TE1.
Why this percentage?
The projection (5.3) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 2.1 points, leaning on Colby Parkinson's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical TE swings before that).
Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 5.
With only 4 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- TE1s have averaged 4.8 receptions, 60.4 receiving yards and 0.6 receiving TDs against the Cardinals across 5 games.
- The Cardinals allow 15.7 PPR points to TE1s, +50% versus the league average of 10.4 (ranked 3 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- Outlier: Week 2, AJ Barner (1 rec, 8 yds) sits far below the other games and drags the averages down. Average with it vs without it: rec 4.8 vs 5.8; yds 60.4 vs 73.5. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- Outlier: Week 3, George Kittle (26.2 pts) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 15.7 vs 13.0. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- 5 of 5 games reached 7+ PPR points. Scores range from 7.9 to 26.2 (median 13.6).
- TE1s scored a touchdown in 3 of 5 games (60%).
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.