Tyson Bagent
QB
Chicago Bears
This is how QBs have played against the Bills in the 2026 season.
| Wk | Team | Player | Cmp | Att | PaYd | PaTD | INT | Car | RuYd | RuTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  HOU | C.J. Stroud | 26 | 38 | 274 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 16.5 |
| 2 |  DET | Jared Goff | 26 | 38 | 327 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 29.8 |
| 3 |  LAC | Justin Herbert | 20 | 34 | 226 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 0 | 12.7 |
| 4 |  NE | Drake Maye | 22 | 37 | 269 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 54 | 0 | 26.2 |
| 5 |  LA | Matthew Stafford | 40 | 54 | 383 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.3 |
| 6 |  LV | Kirk Cousins | 23 | 41 | 313 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18.5 |
| 8 |  BAL | Lamar Jackson | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Average | 22.4 | 34.7 | 256.0 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 13.3 | 0.0 | 18.7 | ||
| Median | 23.0 | 38.0 | 274.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 0.0 | 18.5 | ||
| High | 40 | 54 | 383 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 54 | 0 | 29.8 | ||
| Low | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Tyson Bagent should do vs the BillsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Bills, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Tyson Bagent has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Bills opponents to line them up with: the best QB they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Tyson Bagent will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Bills avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Tyson Bagent's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Tyson Bagent usually produces.
Projected is Tyson Bagent's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Bills were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Cmp | Att | PaYd | PaTD | INT | Car | RuYd | RuTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | MIN | 5 | 9 | 54 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.2 |
| 4 | NYJ | 25 | 34 | 268 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8.8 |
| 5 | GB | 12 | 21 | 87 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 0 | 1.2 |
| Bagent avg | 14.0 | 21.3 | 136.3 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 2.3 | 6.0 | 0.0 | 4.1 | |
| Bills QB1 avg | 22.4 | 34.7 | 256.0 | 2.1 | 0.4 | 2.4 | 13.3 | 0.0 | 18.7 | |
| Difference | +8.4 | +13.4 | +119.7 | +2.1 | -0.6 | +0.1 | +7.3 | +0.0 | +14.7 | |
| Projected as QB1 | 15.3 | 23.4 | 149.4 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 2.6 | 6.6 | 0.0 | 4.3 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Bagent averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
Start / Sit · Tyson BagentMedium confidence · 4.3 proj pts1/10 start
- Tyson Bagent averages 4.1 PPR points over 3 games (recent-weighted 3.9) and has played as the team's QB1.
- The Bills have allowed 18.7 points to QB1s over 7 games (+14% vs league). The model applies 70% of that gap because the sample is small, giving a +10% adjustment.
- Projection: 4.3 points.
- For reference, a typical weekly starter-level QB scores about 19.1 and a top-tier one about 23.8.
- A statistical model from box scores, Vegas lines, weather and injury tags. It cannot see role changes or in-game events.
Prediction & chance to scoreTyson Bagent vs the Bills
Prediction for Tyson Bagent
Nobody knows which slot Tyson Bagent will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Bills.
I predict about 4.3 points for Tyson Bagent if playing as a QB1. Tyson Bagent has averaged 4.1 over 3 games, and the Bills have given up 18.7 to QB1s (+14% vs the league average of 16.5).
How this projection is built
1. The player. Tyson Bagent scored: Wk 2 2.2, Wk 4 8.8, Wk 5 1.2. Average 4.1; weighted toward recent games it is 3.9.
2. The defense. Over 7 games, the Bills allowed 18.7 points to their opponent's QB1. The league average for that slot is 16.5, so that is +14%.
3. Trusting small samples less. With 7 defensive games, only 70% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a +10% adjustment (x1.10).
4. Result. 3.9 x 1.10 = 4.3. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.
It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.
Chance to score
Type a point total to see how likely Tyson Bagent is to reach it as a QB1.
Why this percentage?
The projection (4.3) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 3.4 points, leaning on Tyson Bagent's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical QB swings before that).
Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 4.
With only 3 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- QB1s have averaged 256.0 passing yards, 2.1 passing TDs and 13.3 rushing yards against the Bills across 7 games.
- The Bills allow 18.7 PPR points to QB1s, +14% versus the league average of 16.5 (ranked 9 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- Outlier: Week 8, Lamar Jackson (0.0 pts, 0 pass yds) sits far below the other games and drags the averages down. Average with it vs without it: pts 18.7 vs 21.8; pass yds 256.0 vs 298.7. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- Outlier: Week 2, Jared Goff (29.8 pts) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 18.7 vs 16.9. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- 5 of 7 games reached 15+ PPR points. Scores range from 0.0 to 29.8 (median 18.5).
- QB1s scored a touchdown in 6 of 7 games (86%).
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.