Charlie Jones
WR
New York GiantsQ
- Teammate Malik Nabers (a top target) is questionable.
A hurt top target or lead back nudges the projection up a little, since their work tends to shift to teammates. QB and offensive-line flags are shown for context but do not change the number.
This is how WRs have played against the Commanders in the 2026 season.
WR2 = the second-highest-scoring WR against Commanders in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PHI | DeVonta Smith | 6 | 3 | 53 | 0 | 8.3 |
| 2 | DAL | George Pickens | 8 | 6 | 40 | 0 | 10.0 |
| 3 | SEA | Cooper Kupp | 5 | 4 | 46 | 1 | 14.6 |
| 4 | IND | Ashton Dulin | 6 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 5.9 |
| Average | 6.3 | 4.0 | 42.0 | 0.3 | 9.7 | ||
| Median | 6.0 | 3.5 | 43.0 | 0.0 | 9.2 | ||
| High | 8 | 6 | 53 | 1 | 14.6 | ||
| Low | 5 | 3 | 29 | 0 | 5.9 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Charlie Jones should do vs the CommandersSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Commanders, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Charlie Jones has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Commanders opponents to line them up with: the best WR they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Charlie Jones will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Commanders avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Charlie Jones's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Charlie Jones usually produces.
Projected is Charlie Jones's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Commanders were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | NO | 3 | 2 | 66 | 0 | 8.6 |
| Jones avg | 3.0 | 2.0 | 66.0 | 0.0 | 8.6 | |
| Commanders WR2 avg | 6.3 | 4.0 | 42.0 | 0.3 | 9.7 | |
| Difference | +3.3 | +2.0 | -24.0 | +0.3 | +1.1 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Jones averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- WR2s have averaged 4.0 receptions, 42.0 receiving yards and 0.3 receiving TDs against the Commanders across 4 games.
- The Commanders allow 9.7 PPR points to WR2s, +9% versus the league average of 8.9 (ranked 12 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a near-average matchup.
- Outlier: Week 3, Cooper Kupp (14.6 pts) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 9.7 vs 8.1. The table above keeps the raw averages.
- 2 of 4 games reached 10+ PPR points. Scores range from 5.9 to 14.6 (median 9.2).
- WR2s scored a touchdown in 1 of 4 games (25%).
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.



