Olamide Zaccheaus
WR
Atlanta Falcons
This is how WRs have played against the Bengals in the 2026 season.
WR3 = the third-highest-scoring WR against Bengals in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.
| Wk | Team | Player | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  TB | Ted Hurst III | 3 | 3 | 36 | 0 | 6.6 |
| 2 |  HOU | Jaylin Noel | 5 | 1 | 31 | 0 | 5.4 |
| 3 |  PIT | Ben Skowronek | 1 | 1 | 23 | 1 | 9.3 |
| 4 |  JAX | Josh Cameron | 2 | 2 | 42 | 0 | 6.2 |
| 5 |  MIA | Jalen Tolbert | 2 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 3.2 |
| 7 |  BAL | Rashod Bateman | 4 | 2 | 33 | 0 | 5.3 |
| 8 |  TEN | Elic Ayomanor | 5 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 6.4 |
| Average | 3.1 | 1.9 | 31.6 | 0.1 | 6.1 | ||
| Median | 3.0 | 2.0 | 33.0 | 0.0 | 6.2 | ||
| High | 5 | 3 | 42 | 1 | 9.3 | ||
| Low | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 3.2 | ||
Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.
How Olamide Zaccheaus should do vs the BengalsSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection
Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Bengals, plus a projection for this game.
What is this table?
Rows at the top are every game Olamide Zaccheaus has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.
Compare against picks which group of Bengals opponents to line them up with: the best WR they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Olamide Zaccheaus will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.
Bengals avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Olamide Zaccheaus's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Olamide Zaccheaus usually produces.
Projected is Olamide Zaccheaus's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Bengals were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.
| Wk | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | FPts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PIT | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1.5 |
| 2 | CAR | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1.3 |
| 3 | GB | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 2.9 |
| 4 | NO | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 6 | CHI | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 8 | TB | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1.4 |
| Zaccheaus avg | 2.2 | 0.8 | 3.5 | 0.0 | 1.2 | |
| Bengals WR3 avg | 3.1 | 1.9 | 31.6 | 0.1 | 6.1 | |
| Difference | +1.0 | +1.0 | +28.1 | +0.1 | +4.9 | |
| Projected as WR3 | 2.8 | 1.1 | 4.4 | 0.0 | 2.9 | |
Difference is what the defense allows minus what Zaccheaus averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.
Start / Sit · Olamide ZaccheausGood confidence · 3.3 proj pts1/10 start
- Olamide Zaccheaus averages 1.2 PPR points over 6 games (recent-weighted 1.1) and has played as the team's WR3.
- The Bengals have allowed 6.1 points to WR3s over 7 games (+39% vs league). The model applies 70% of that gap because the sample is small, giving a +27% adjustment.
- Last season's average (6.1) is blended in at 25% weight because this season's sample is small.
- Game environment +9%: Vegas total 52.5, implied 24.8 points for ATL (league avg 22.6); Underdog by 3: likely to pass more while trailing; Indoors: no weather effect, a small boost for passing and kicking.
- QB change: Michael Penix Jr. is now throwing (7.5 yds/att vs 7.2 earlier), x1.02.
- Opposing-defense injuries (+1%): Opposing starter Jordan Battle (S) is questionable, which helps the passing game. Opposing starter Cedric Johnson (DL) is questionable, which helps the passing game.
- Projection: 3.3 points.
- For reference, a typical weekly starter-level WR scores about 12.2 and a top-tier one about 20.9.
- A statistical model from box scores, Vegas lines, weather and injury tags. It cannot see role changes or in-game events.
Prediction & chance to scoreOlamide Zaccheaus vs the Bengals
Prediction for Olamide Zaccheaus
Nobody knows which slot Olamide Zaccheaus will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Bengals.
I predict about 2.9 points for Olamide Zaccheaus if playing as a WR3. Olamide Zaccheaus has averaged 1.2 over 6 games, and the Bengals have given up 6.1 to WR3s (+39% vs the league average of 4.4).
How this projection is built
1. The player. Olamide Zaccheaus scored: Wk 1 1.5, Wk 2 1.3, Wk 3 2.9, Wk 4 0.0, Wk 6 0.0, Wk 8 1.4. Average 1.2; weighted toward recent games it is 2.3.
2. The defense. Over 7 games, the Bengals allowed 6.1 points to their opponent's WR3. The league average for that slot is 4.4, so that is +39%.
3. Trusting small samples less. With 7 defensive games, only 70% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a +27% adjustment (x1.27).
4. Result. 2.3 x 1.27 = 2.9. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.
It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.
Chance to score
Type a point total to see how likely Olamide Zaccheaus is to reach it as a WR3.
Why this percentage?
The projection (2.9) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 1.2 points, leaning on Olamide Zaccheaus's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical WR swings before that).
Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 3.
With only 6 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.
InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
- WR3s have averaged 1.9 receptions, 31.6 receiving yards and 0.1 receiving TDs against the Bengals across 7 games.
- The Bengals allow 6.1 PPR points to WR3s, +39% versus the league average of 4.4 (ranked 3 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
- 0 of 7 games reached 10+ PPR points. Scores range from 3.2 to 9.3 (median 6.2).
- WR3s scored a touchdown in 1 of 7 games (14%).
Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.