SportsProof
Cade Stover

Cade Stover

TEHOUHouston Texans

Other TEs on HOU
Games
3
2026 season
PPR PPG
2.2
TE78 overall
Total pts
6.7

This is how TEs have played against the Chargers in the 2026 season.

TE1 = the highest-scoring TE against Chargers in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.

WkTeamPlayerTgtRecReYdReTDFPts
1ARIARITrey McBride13995124.5
2LVLVMichael Mayer432305.3
3BUFBUFDalton Kincaid323803.8
4SEASEAAJ Barner311202.2
5DENDENEvan Engram445509.5
6KCKCTravis Kelce545309.3
8LALADavis Allen22802.8
Average4.93.640.60.18.2
Median4.03.038.00.05.3
High13995124.5
Low21802.2

Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.

TE1 avg pts
8.2
PPR per game
Rank
26
of 32 (1 = most allowed)
vs League
-22%
lg avg 10.5
How Cade Stover should do vs the ChargersSeason log, the group you pick, and a projection

Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Chargers, plus a projection for this game.

What is this table?

Rows at the top are every game Cade Stover has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.

Compare against picks which group of Chargers opponents to line them up with: the best TE they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Cade Stover will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.

Chargers avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Cade Stover's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Cade Stover usually produces.

Projected is Cade Stover's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Chargers were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.

Compare against
WkOppTgtRecReYdReTDFPts
1BUF11-200.8
4DAL112003.0
7NYG11-102.9
Stover avg1.01.05.70.02.2
Chargers TE1 avg4.93.640.60.18.2
Difference+3.9+2.6+34.9+0.1+6.0
Projected as TE10.80.84.80.02.3

Difference is what the defense allows minus what Stover averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.

Start / Sit · Cade StoverGood confidence · 2.4 proj pts1/10 start
  • Cade Stover averages 2.2 PPR points over 3 games (recent-weighted 2.4) and has played as the team's TE1.
  • The Chargers have allowed 8.2 points to TE1s over 7 games (-22% vs league). The model applies 70% of that gap because the sample is small, giving a -16% adjustment.
  • Last season's average (3.3) is blended in at 40% weight because this season's sample is small.
  • Game environment +2%: Vegas total 40.5, implied 23.0 points for HOU (league avg 22.6); Favored by 5.5: leaning run-heavy late; Indoors: no weather effect, a small boost for passing and kicking.
  • Opposing-defense injuries (+0%): Opposing starter Daiyan Henley (LB) is questionable, which helps the passing game.
  • Projection: 2.4 points.
  • For reference, a typical weekly starter-level TE scores about 13.5 and a top-tier one about 19.5.
  • A statistical model from box scores, Vegas lines, weather and injury tags. It cannot see role changes or in-game events.
Prediction & chance to scoreCade Stover vs the Chargers

Prediction for Cade Stover

Nobody knows which slot Cade Stover will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Chargers.

If Cade Stover plays as
2.3
projected PPR points

I predict about 2.3 points for Cade Stover if playing as a TE1. Cade Stover has averaged 2.2 over 3 games, and the Chargers have given up 8.2 to TE1s (-22% vs the league average of 10.5).

How this projection is built

1. The player. Cade Stover scored: Wk 1 0.8, Wk 4 3.0, Wk 7 2.9. Average 2.2; weighted toward recent games it is 2.8.

2. The defense. Over 7 games, the Chargers allowed 8.2 points to their opponent's TE1. The league average for that slot is 10.5, so that is -22%.

3. Trusting small samples less. With 7 defensive games, only 70% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a -16% adjustment (x0.84).

4. Result. 2.8 x 0.84 = 2.3. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.

It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.

Chance to score

Type a point total to see how likely Cade Stover is to reach it as a TE1.

53%
chance of 2+ PPR points
Why this percentage?

The projection (2.3) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 1.3 points, leaning on Cade Stover's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical TE swings before that).

Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 2.

With only 3 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.

InsightsPlain-English takeaways from the table
  • TE1s have averaged 3.6 receptions, 40.6 receiving yards and 0.1 receiving TDs against the Chargers across 7 games.
  • The Chargers allow 8.2 PPR points to TE1s, -22% versus the league average of 10.5 (ranked 26 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a tough matchup.
  • Outlier: Week 1, Trey McBride (24.5 pts, 9 rec, 95 yds) sits far above the other games and pulls the averages up. Average with it vs without it: pts 8.2 vs 5.5; rec 3.6 vs 2.7; yds 40.6 vs 31.5. The table above keeps the raw averages.
  • Outlier: Week 4, AJ Barner (2.2 pts, 1 rec, 12 yds) sits far below the other games and drags the averages down. Average with it vs without it: pts 8.2 vs 9.2; rec 3.6 vs 4.0; yds 40.6 vs 45.3. The table above keeps the raw averages.
  • 3 of 7 games reached 7+ PPR points. Scores range from 2.2 to 24.5 (median 5.3).
  • TE1s scored a touchdown in 1 of 7 games (14%).

Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.