SportsProof
Matthew Golden
ATL

WRs vs Atlanta Falcons

As of Week 3 · through 2 games · PPR

Matthew Golden
Comparing
Matthew Golden vs the Falcons
Projection 10.4 pts · 2 games played this season
Flex

WR3 = the third-highest-scoring WR against Falcons in each game, not a fixed depth-chart spot.

WR3 avg pts
7.0
PPR per game
Rank
5
of 32 (1 = most allowed)
vs League
+53%
lg avg 4.6
WkTeamPlayerTgtRecReYdReTDFPts
1PITPITRoman Wilson632605.6
2CARCARXavier Legette426408.4
Average5.02.545.00.07.0
Median5.02.545.00.07.0
High636408.4
Low422605.6

Averages are raw, outliers are never removed.

Prediction for Matthew Golden

Nobody knows which slot Matthew Golden will land in this week, so pick the one you expect. The projection changes because each slot faces a different average from the Falcons.

If Matthew Golden plays as
9.9
projected PPR points

I predict about 9.9 points for Matthew Golden if playing as a WR2. Matthew Golden has averaged 12.7 over 2 games, and the Falcons have given up 11.3 to WR2s (+36% vs the league average of 8.3).

How this projection is built

1. The player. Matthew Golden scored: Wk 1 15.5, Wk 2 9.8. Average 12.7; weighted toward recent games it is 8.7.

2. The defense. Over 2 games, the Falcons allowed 11.3 points to their opponent's WR2. The league average for that slot is 8.3, so that is +36%.

3. Trusting small samples less. With 2 defensive games, only 40% of the gap is applied, capped at +/-30%. That gives a +15% adjustment (x1.15).

4. Result. 8.7 x 1.15 = 9.9. Switching slots only changes step 2 and 3: the player's own numbers stay the same, but each slot faces a different defensive average.

It is a statistical model, not knowledge of injuries, game script or weather.

Chance to score

Type a point total to see how likely Matthew Golden is to reach it as a WR2.

42%
chance of 10+ PPR points
Why this percentage?

The projection (9.9) is the middle of the range. Fantasy scores swing a lot from game to game, so the model spreads possible scores around it by about 6.0 points, leaning on Matthew Golden's own game-to-game swings once there are several games (and on typical WR swings before that).

Scores are modelled as right-skewed, since a big game is possible but a very negative one is not. The percentage is the share of that spread at or above 10.

With only 2 games of history, treat this as a rough gauge. It gets sharper as the season goes on. It is never lower than 1% or higher than 99%.

Insights

  • WR3s have averaged 2.5 receptions, 45.0 receiving yards and 0.0 receiving TDs against the Falcons across 2 games.
  • The Falcons allow 7.0 PPR points to WR3s, +53% versus the league average of 4.6 (ranked 5 of 32, where 1 is most generous). That is a favorable matchup.
  • 0 of 2 games reached 10+ PPR points. Scores range from 5.6 to 8.4 (median 7.0).
  • WR3s scored a touchdown in 0 of 2 games (0%).
  • Small sample: only 2 games so far. Treat these numbers as directional, not settled.

Insights are generated by rules from the table above and recalculate every week.

What do these columns mean?
Wk
Week of the season
Tgt
Targets (passes thrown to the player)
Rec
Receptions
ReYd
Receiving yards
ReTD
Receiving touchdowns
Car
Carries (rushing attempts)
RuYd
Rushing yards
RuTD
Rushing touchdowns
Cmp / Att
Completions and pass attempts
PaYd / PaTD
Passing yards and touchdowns
INT
Interceptions thrown
FGM / FGA
Field goals made and attempted
FPts
Fantasy points in your scoring format
Sck / TO
Defense: sacks and takeaways
PA
Points allowed by a defense
G
Games in the sample
vs Lg
Percent above or below the league average
Start / Sit · Matthew Golden
Flex10.4 proj pts
Medium confidence

Matthew Golden usually plays as the team's WR2, so the verdict uses the WR2 numbers, not the slot selected above.

  • Matthew Golden averages 12.7 PPR points over 2 games (recent-weighted 12.3) and has played as the team's WR2.
  • The Falcons have allowed 11.3 points to WR2s over 2 games (+36% vs league). The model applies 40% of that gap because the sample is small, giving a +15% adjustment.
  • Last season's average (5.0) is blended in at 50% weight because this season's sample is small.
  • Game environment +3%: Vegas total 43.5, implied 25.3 points for GB (league avg 22.5); Favored by 7: leaning run-heavy late; Mild weather (57F, 5 mph wind): no weather adjustment.
  • Opposing-defense injuries (+1%): Opposing starter A.J. Terrell Jr. (CB) is questionable, which helps the passing game.
  • Projection: 10.4 points.
  • For reference, a typical weekly starter-level WR scores about 11.8 and a top-tier one about 20.8.
  • A statistical model from box scores, Vegas lines, weather and injury tags. It cannot see role changes or in-game events.

Matthew Golden's stats vs the Falcons

Season so far, compared with what the group you pick below has done against the Falcons, plus a projection for this game.

What is this table?

Rows at the top are every game Matthew Golden has played this season, using the same stat columns as the table above.

Compare against picks which group of Falcons opponents to line them up with: the best WR they faced in each game (1), the second best (2), the third best (3), or all of the top three. Nobody knows which slot Matthew Golden will land in this week, so this is your call, not a guess.

Falcons avg is the average line of that group. Difference is that minus Matthew Golden's own average: green means the defense gives that slot more than Matthew Golden usually produces.

Projected is Matthew Golden's recent-weighted average scaled by how generous the Falcons were to the slot you picked. Change the slot and the projected points change, because each slot has a different matchup adjustment. Picking Top 3 uses the usual-role projection.

Compare against
WkOppTgtRecReYdReTDFPts
1MIN12695015.5
2NYJ645809.8
Golden avg9.05.076.50.012.7
Falcons WR3 avg5.02.545.00.07.0
Difference-4.0-2.5-31.5+0.0-5.7
Projected as WR310.96.192.80.010.5

Difference is what the defense allows minus what Golden averages (green = defense gives up more). Projected stats scale the player's averages by the matchup adjustment, so they are a rough guide.